Ever wondered why ‘Global Warming’ was termed ‘Global Warming’? Was it because the effect is Global, or was it due to the fact that everyone all over the world is causing this ‘disease’ Mother Earth now face? Either way, it can be argued that both explanations are close to the truth – Globalization has taught us that we are forever interlinked, and thus, chances are, we do the same thing, and no matter who does what, so long that there’s one who does not follow, the effect will still be the same for all of us.
Globalization is change. Change experienced by everyone, all over the world. If such a principle were to hold, then why is the world not really working together to solve such a great problem that could greatly threaten mankind? Globalization has changed our lives, and it will continue to do so. Yet the idea of the “global village” that comes along with Globalization is simply difficult to imagine. In fact, it seems that the different countries in the world would never put aside their differences and privileges to work together. When faced with problems brought about by industrialization all over the world due to Globalization, it makes sense if everyone were to play a part in solving these problems. Unfortunately, this is not the case.
(Definition of The Kyoto Protocol taken from Wikipedia)
Kyoto Protocol is a noble intention, a treaty brought about by Globalization. Thanks to Globalization, everyone is given the chance to industrialize, and in turn, the harm to nature is greater. Its effect can be felt regardless of whether a country take part in the pollution, and thus it is important. The Kyoto Protocol targets are reducing emissions in order to combat Global Warming. But firstly, is everybody accepting the Global Warming exists?
The Deniers


The above cartoons are good examples of a group of people known as the Deniers of Global Warming, and if one were to like to narrow the category, America would certainly fit in. America is known to have signed the Kyoto Protocol but not ratify it for various reasons. It is oxymoronic to even think that America was the one who initiated the Protocol in the first place.
The Deniers basically deny the existence of Global Warming. And in doing so, they could very well undermine the movement which aims at saving ourselves from Global Warming. They are not without backing either. Statistics such as those that claims that the climate and temperature change is just part of the natural cycle backs the deniers up. Either they deny that it is not happening, or they feel that it is self-correcting. In other words, it is not due to our actions. Such ideas are open to all of us thanks to Globalization, but imagine if people were to blindly follow such excuses. Is Kyoto Protocol really nonsense?
Kyoto Protocol
Perhaps one of the biggest flaws of the Kyoto Protocol would be that only Annex I countries are required to ratify it. Annex I countries are countries that are already developed. The idea would be that they already have the necessary infrastructure and background which would make things easier. However, like the USA argues, developing countries DO give out emissions. All are effects of Globalization, and Kyoto Protocol is too. Therefore, why should Kyoto Protocol leave out the developing countries? Isn’t it better to nip the problem in the bud? If we are all part of this “Global Village”, then everyone SHOULD be included in this treaty. Whatever the case, USA has no excuse to not ratify the Kyoto Protocol, as it is in fact one of the more influential members of the International Community.
In conclusion, if the Kyoto Protocol is all about combating the major side effect of Globalization, then everyone, regardless of race, size and influence, in the International Community should be part of it as well. If Globalization was the force that brought the world together, it is only right that with Globalization, we ought to remain together to solve the issues brought about by Globalization.
This writer assumes the role of environment and health expert. =)-Teresa
Globalization is change. Change experienced by everyone, all over the world. If such a principle were to hold, then why is the world not really working together to solve such a great problem that could greatly threaten mankind? Globalization has changed our lives, and it will continue to do so. Yet the idea of the “global village” that comes along with Globalization is simply difficult to imagine. In fact, it seems that the different countries in the world would never put aside their differences and privileges to work together. When faced with problems brought about by industrialization all over the world due to Globalization, it makes sense if everyone were to play a part in solving these problems. Unfortunately, this is not the case.
The Kyoto Protocol is an agreement made under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Countries that ratify this protocol commit to reduce their emissions of carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases, or engage in emissions trading if they maintain or increase emissions of these gases.
(Definition of The Kyoto Protocol taken from Wikipedia)
Kyoto Protocol is a noble intention, a treaty brought about by Globalization. Thanks to Globalization, everyone is given the chance to industrialize, and in turn, the harm to nature is greater. Its effect can be felt regardless of whether a country take part in the pollution, and thus it is important. The Kyoto Protocol targets are reducing emissions in order to combat Global Warming. But firstly, is everybody accepting the Global Warming exists?
The Deniers


The above cartoons are good examples of a group of people known as the Deniers of Global Warming, and if one were to like to narrow the category, America would certainly fit in. America is known to have signed the Kyoto Protocol but not ratify it for various reasons. It is oxymoronic to even think that America was the one who initiated the Protocol in the first place.
The Deniers basically deny the existence of Global Warming. And in doing so, they could very well undermine the movement which aims at saving ourselves from Global Warming. They are not without backing either. Statistics such as those that claims that the climate and temperature change is just part of the natural cycle backs the deniers up. Either they deny that it is not happening, or they feel that it is self-correcting. In other words, it is not due to our actions. Such ideas are open to all of us thanks to Globalization, but imagine if people were to blindly follow such excuses. Is Kyoto Protocol really nonsense?
Kyoto Protocol
Perhaps one of the biggest flaws of the Kyoto Protocol would be that only Annex I countries are required to ratify it. Annex I countries are countries that are already developed. The idea would be that they already have the necessary infrastructure and background which would make things easier. However, like the USA argues, developing countries DO give out emissions. All are effects of Globalization, and Kyoto Protocol is too. Therefore, why should Kyoto Protocol leave out the developing countries? Isn’t it better to nip the problem in the bud? If we are all part of this “Global Village”, then everyone SHOULD be included in this treaty. Whatever the case, USA has no excuse to not ratify the Kyoto Protocol, as it is in fact one of the more influential members of the International Community.
In conclusion, if the Kyoto Protocol is all about combating the major side effect of Globalization, then everyone, regardless of race, size and influence, in the International Community should be part of it as well. If Globalization was the force that brought the world together, it is only right that with Globalization, we ought to remain together to solve the issues brought about by Globalization.
This writer assumes the role of environment and health expert. =)-Teresa










